About Me

Name: BrianR
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

James Madison on the $700 Billion "Bailout"

 
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on the objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents."
 
Madison would probably be having a heart attack right about now.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (248) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What "Debate"?

 
High point of the debate the other night:
 
McCain: "Obama, you're a liberal".

Obama: "No, John, YOU'RE a liberal".

McCain: "Hah! I'm not Miss Congeniality, I'm Maverick!"

Obama: "I saw both those movies, you're not Tom Cruise, and Sandra Bullock has better legs!"
 
McCain: "Palin".
 
Obama: "I agree with you there, John. Great gams!"

McCain: "And you're liberaler!"

Obama: "Kissinger says you're even liberalerer! And you're stupid."
 
McCain: "I can write two letters like Eisenhower"
 
Obama: "Which two letters? A and B?"
 
Me: "I thought the debate was supposed to be on. How come I'm watching 'The Odd Couple'?"
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (211) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Saint John the Dragonslayer

 
Yesterday's pathetically obvious political ploy by McCain of trying to "suspend" the campaigning and debates in order to mount his trusty steed and gallop back to Washington to save the country truly highlighted his sense of self-aggrandizement.
 
The guy wants to be President without having to go through all the hassle of actually campaigning for the job. Amazing, even for him!
 
I'll hand this one to Obambi, for rightfully pointing out the absurdity of the idea. As he said, a President's supposed to be able to do more than one thing at a time.
 
The height of McCain's arrogance -- to the point of hubris -- continues to astound.
 
 
UPDATE
 
Though it was so essential to "suspend" the campaign and debates, somehow or another Emperor-in-Waiting McCain DID find time today to speak IN PERSON at Bill Clinton's Global Initiative to plug his Cap and Trade BS and wave the flag of "climate change".
 
Would that he showed this kind of commitment to ANY truly conservative cause.
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (219) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Working Within the "System"

 

We, as a country, have wandered so far away from any concept of the limited power of government that I sometimes wonder what country I'm waking up in every morning.

Do I think we'll see our military having to engage in large-scale suppressive action against citizens, as some theorize, based on the concept of the citizenry being outraged by governmental overreach and engaging in open revolt?

No. To see why, you should take a look at my "Bread and Circuses" essay. Here's the link:

http://viewfromtheisland.blogtownhall.com/2008/02/13/bread_and_circuses.thtml

We're long past that point, unfortunately. Yes, people like US can envision some kind of citizen uprising, because we're strongly motivated and opinionated folks who are political junkies, tuned in to the current issues and aware of the ramifications and implications. We can see OURSELVES doing it.

Joe Sixpack's a whole other animal. He's tuned in to getting his kids to school on time, doing well at work, making the rent and car payments, rush hour traffic, what's on TV tonight, and what's for dinner.

If he pays attention to politics at all, it's only a month or two before the election... and it bores him to tears. He couldn't really care about issues in depth, it's all about sound bites. MAYBE he'll watch a debate or two; half the Joes and Janes won't even bother voting.

So while WE are getting outraged about the unconstitutional nature of the "bailouts" being proposed by everyone in sight other than Mike Spence -- Bush & Co, Obambi, McLiberal, the Congresscritters, the GOP, the Dems, and every other talking head on the Sunday Circuit -- all Joe and Jane care about is this:

"Congress and the administration are addressing the issue". So Joe and Jane heave a sigh of relief and grab another slice of pizza and a brewski, content that they'll be okay; all those financial problems are someone ELSE'S problem.

Is this a guy and gal who are going to become outraged enough to DEMAND accountability from their government, to the point of being willing to grab a gun and sacrifice the big screen, pizza delivery, bowling league, secure job, and pension plan because they're outraged by governmental overreach?

Are you kidding me?

That's exactly why we must dedicate ourselves to working within the system to effectuate substantive and meaningful changes. That means sticking to our principles, and utilizing every avenue to make our point known: communicating our ideas on the "local" level to our House representatives; responding to EVERY "money-gram" from the political parties as to WHY we're refusing to contribute our time or money, both the mail letters as WELL as the phone solicitaions (DO NOT hang up on them; give them an earful); being willing to stick to our guns and vote third-party if we're so inclined; discuss the candidates and issues CALMLY and INTELLIGENTLY with your social circle. A variety of other avenues exist.

This is an ongoing process. We didn't get in this mess overnight, and we won't get out of it this November.

But if we stick to our guns and work away at it, there is hope. Again, history speaks to us. There was a two-party system in this country consisting of the Democrats and the WHIGs. The WHIGs followed the same historical arc of the present-day GOP, offering themselves up as the Dem-Lite Party of their day. They ultimately met their demise as a political party, due to a stubborn and ever-enlarging core of principled advocates who refused to "go along" with that party's compromises on the issues of the day... at that time, slavery.

And guess what party replaced THEM? Yep. The GOP. Back when it actually stood for something.

We can do the same thing, as long as we don't expect instant results. It's a process.

Have faith, and keep heart.


 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (278) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Remind Me Again: What Party's This Guy Running In?

 
I've posted this as a comment on a couple of threads, but I think it deserves its own spot. The other night I saw a McCain/Palin ad on TV. Here is the salient quote:

"Twin Mavericks

"HE took on the GOP and reformed Washington

"SHE took on the GOP and reformed Alaska."




Um.... exactly what party do these people think they're running in?


All those who are holding your noses..... THAT'S what McCain thinks of YOU, your PARTY, and CONSERVATIVES IN GENERAL.

Because just exactly WHO has McCain been "taking on" in Washington the last 20 years? It sure as HELL wasn't the liberals, who all have their names on his bills as co-sponsors.

It's the CONSERVATIVES whose eyes he's poked out, while taking great pride in doing so.

You want to vote for that guy???????

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (197) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Talk to the Hand!

Thanks to Pasadena Phil for the great idea for the title.
 
And, of course, it refers to the constant barrage and diatribes about how "a vote for Barr is a vote for Obama".
 
Hey! I'm sure that to OBAMA "a vote for Barr is a vote for MCCAIN!"
 
Let's face it, there's not ONE person ANYWHERE whose single vote is going to determine an election outcome.

But if every single one of us would just stick to our principles, no matter what, then we wouldn't find ourselves continually in this position of constantly having to search for the lesser of evils.

The very IDEA that the LESSER OF EVILS is in any way acceptable is simply despicable and abhorrent in a country in which tens of thousands have died in the Revolution and the Civil War to make sure we have a foundation from which we can seek our BEST.... and now we're resigned to compromising on our most mediocre.

Simply appalling.
 
For me, this ends here; the line has been drawn in the sand.
 
It's not like the GOP wasn't warned. Conservatives have been grumbling for over a YEAR, so if McCain loses, they have no one to blame but themselves.
 

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (217) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obambi's View of the Political Horizon:

 
Storm Clouds
 
 
 
New meeting of the SCDS is now in session!
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (187) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Cold Light of Day?

 
The shotgun wedding of McCain and Palin may be facing its first dose of harsh reality very soon, and I have to wonder if the wedding guests will be asking that their gifts be returned.

It seems that so far Palin’s been shielded by McCain’s campaign team from making any ad hoc comments, participating in any unscripted events, or being available to reporters to answer any questions. Read the entire story here or here.

You don’t have to think about this very hard to realize the problem the McCain campaign faces.

Palin’s the red meat McCain’s thrown to conservatives to get their support. It’s been surprisingly effective.

But what’s going to happen once they can’t control the flow of conversation anymore? When the reporters get to ask whatever they want?

I know what I’d ask.

“Governor Palin, you’re FOR drilling in ANWR; McCain’s against it. How do you reconcile that?”

“Governor Palin, what’s your position on amnesty? Do you support McCain’s position as being strongly for it?”

“Governor Palin, you’ve previously stated you think ‘climate change’ isn’t a man-made phenomenon. Is that still your position? Or do you now endorse your boss’s position?”

“Governor Palin, in light of your position that ‘climate change’ isn’t man-made, do you support your boss’s proposal for Cap and Trade legislation?”

And more along the same line. And I actually LIKE Palin (though not McCain); how do you think the reporters from the Left are going to treat her? There's no way she can avoid answering their questions; that would play even worse.

There is absolutely no upside in this for Palin (and her political future) or McCain that I can see. She either has to almost totally recant her previous positions – sacrificing her credibility and “conservativeness” – or state that even though she disagrees with McCain on MAJOR policy issues, she’s still willing to run with him, essentially calling into question the depth of her own commitment to her previous positions. Either way, her position as the “conservative leavening” of McCain will be shown as the sham it really is.

She’s in the same position Lieberman was in as Gore’s VP nominee, having to advocate policies with which he strongly disagreed, and he absolutely LOOKED like a cat on a griddle when he had to do so. It also irreparably harmed his reputation as a man of integrity, a reality now facing Palin.

The blush may very soon be coming off the rose.
 
UPDATE:
 
Apparently Charlie Gibson will be doing the ABC interview. For details on this story, click here
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (197) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain… Arrogant? Or Just Plain Stupid?

 

I just saw this article on the Townhall Home Page, entitled “McCain Pledges to Appoint Democrats to Cabinet”: here

Sheesh! Is this guy really THAT stupid? Or is this simply further evidence of the breadth of his arrogance?

He gets a helping hand with conservatives and "hold your nosers" by naming Palin, a woman with some arguable conservative chops, and promptly turns right around and promises to name Dems to his cabinet.

Some more of the legendary "reaching across the aisle".

What does this say about him? About the judges he’ll appoint, an issue so many yammer about in trying to justify their votes for McCain in spite of needing a military-grade gas mask to do so? About his ability to “listen” to conservatives?

Maybe he “listens”, but he sure as hell doesn’t “HEAR” anything!

While McCain and his Cabinet of Democrats and “moderate” Republicans (if we’re lucky!) are meeting in the White House, Palin will be in her office in the OEOB across the street, counting rubber bands.

As I have maintained right along, the naming of Palin is MEANINGLESS, because the old tiger hasn’t changed his stripes. He’s still a moderate Democrat running in the wrong party.
 
 
Update on Monday, 8 Sep:
 
Today, McCain vowed to "take on the GOP and Bush" (read the whole article  here ).
 
"McCain has not offered specific solutions to problems, saying instead he will reach out to Democrats to find answers. He said he would have more than one Democrat in his Cabinet."
 
That, of course, is the perennial problem with McCain. Always "reaching out" to Democrats for his solutions, NEVER conservatives.
 
His administration will make Bush look like the reincarnation of Reagan by comparison, and Bush was pretty darned bad.

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (148) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Listen up, Palinistas!

 
This meeting of the Saint Crispin’s Day Society is hereby called to order here at The Orphanage!

Interesting analysis of McCain’s acceptance speech of last night Here

Some highlights to consider, particularly by those who’ve worked themselves into a tizzy over the naming of Palin as McCain’s VP nominee.

“McCain’s path to victory in November is found in setting himself apart from his own deeply unpopular party… It’s a task, like many others before them, that McCain intimates believe has been made considerably easier with his selection of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin to be his running mate.”

Yep. As I’ve written, she’s simply his conservative “beard”. Also interesting: “setting himself apart from” the GOP, yet WE’RE castigated for doing the same thing by refusing to vote for the guy. A little double-standard there? Hmmmmmm?…..

“By picking an across-the-board conservative, McCain aides argue, they’ve allayed long-festering fears about the unpredictable Arizona senator among the conservative core of the party and empowered him to move away from the party brand without unduly angering GOP stalwarts.”

To, in other words, give conservatives the finger once again. What’s new? “Hey, here’s your stinkin’ conservative! Now leave me alone while I do my thing!” Unfortunately his idea of “mov(ing) away from the party brand” means hiking to the Left.

“’The base will now stay solid,’ said a top McCain aide. ‘The VP choice helps ensure that.’” In other words, they’ll ignore the man behind the curtain.

Hey, Palinistas. May I suggest Raspberry flavor for your Kool-Aid?

It was always my favorite.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (165) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Orphanage

 
Yesterday, Virgina Patriot suggested I put up a new essay as the thread on the last one was getting kind of long -- 219 comments as of right now. Thanks, all!
 
He also mentioned that The Island has become kind of a touch-base for the disaffected conservatives; I'm flattered. To quote VaPat: "How about posting something/anything as often as needed just to provide a place for we happy few to hang out among friends? It doesn't have to be anything more than a 'Hey Guys, Here's another thread, the last one's too long.'"
 
Sounds like a plan to me! I'll keep an eye on comment count on the threads, and start a new one when required. No real topic, necessarily, just kind of an open forum.
 
And since we ARE disowned pretty much by our former "comrades", I got thinking about Reagan, and his statement that "I didn't leave the Democrat Party. The Democrat Party left me". Now I truly understand what he meant. At least in his time, there was a viable home for him to move to: the Goldwater wing of the GOP.
 
For us right now, there isn't that option. We've become orphans for now, hence the title of this essay. The Island has become The Orphanage.
 
And that's okay, because as Henry V said on St. Crispin's Day at the Battle of Agincourt (per The Bard), "We few, we happy few, we band of brothers (and sisters), for he (or she) today who sheds his (or her) blood with me shall be my brother (or sister)". Of course, there weren't any battle participants of the fairer sex, so I kinda broadened the applicability.... but you get my drift. And the reference in VaPat's comment.
 
It has been very eye-opening to see the absolute hysteria with which dissent has been met. Pretty funny, too, frankly!
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (104) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »